So I saw "What the Bleep"
And it's kinda annoying.
Here's one reason why. The woman has an annoying ring tone. And she's deaf. Could she put the fucker on vibrate???
Second reason, Good god, people, soundbytes and science don't mix. Neither does soundbytes and the questions of existence, purpose, and god. Please talk to me longer than 2 minutes when getting a point across. Why? Because the one liners are better for comedy.
I am fascinated by the science of the mind, the science of religion. I don't really need science to prove God to me. In fact, that seems really useless. If God didn't exist, I'd pursue God in the same way. Much like I pursue the magic of Christmas or the "color of love" (cuz I can be a hippie that way). A little pondering of the neurons and brain patterns of enlightenment is kinda fun. But I like to really roll up my sleeves and dig deep when it comes to that stuff. Dr Newberg is fascinating and he takes a fairly long Newsweek article or a full book for him to really get into one little pinpoint of his research. I got four minutes max of him in that movie. And I got a too heavy dose of a woman "channelling" an ancient Indian man. Ramtha. Ramtha talks a good game, but for this girl, he's a dead guy channeling himself through a woman who looks a little too much like the lip injected chick from "Best In Show." (side note: I just watched Cinderella Story because that woman is in it. SHE IS A RIOT! end side note).

1 Comments:
See my science God explanation above, O :)
11:38 AM
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home